Showing posts with label cap and trade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cap and trade. Show all posts

Sunday, March 28, 2010

The Rubio WIN in Today’s Debate

"Charlie Crist avoided debating Marco Rubio for almost year – and now we know why!

This morning's debate was a clear victory for Marco Rubio as he showed why he is the only candidate in this Senate race that can be trusted to go to Washington, stand up to the Obama-Pelosi-Reid-Meek agenda and offer a clear alternative. On the other hand, because Charlie Crist had no vision, record or conservative principles to promote, he did what politicians do – distort and attack.

Floridians were able to see the clear policy differences that exist between Marco Rubio and Charlie Crist.

See for yourself here.

The record is clear. Whether it's the stimulus, cap-and-trade, ObamaCare or raising taxes, Charlie Crist's unhealthy appetite for bigger government is out of step with mainstream Floridians. His insistence on distorting Marco Rubio's record is a disservice to millions of Floridians who are tired of the politics-as-usual that Charlie Crist insists on peddling. Marco Rubio has a proven record of standing up to liberal agendas: whether it's being a consistent voice against the Obama/Pelosi agenda in Washington DC or stopping Charlie Crist's liberal agenda in Tallahassee by blocking his efforts to expand gambling or stopping the Crist cap and trade mandate.

Now it's time to stand with the ONLY conservative in this race we can trust to stand up to the dangerous liberal agenda happening in Washington right now. We need you to stand with Marco today by contributing to his campaign. And share this highlight from the debate with your friends. Tell them why you are supporting Marco.

Together, each of us can make a difference and put this country back on the right track by electing principled conservative leaders like Marco Rubio!

Thank you for your support,

Team Rubio

P.S. - Senator Jim Demint joined in watching the debate and had this to say after – we think it summed up pretty well and hope you share his enthusiasm as we move to the next level in this campaign.

Special note from Jim Demint: 'Like many Republicans across the country, I watched today's debate with great interest. With every passing day, my support for Marco Rubio grows stronger and more enthusiastic. Today's debate showed exactly why more and more Republicans are excited by the conservative renewal that's building in Florida because of Marco's candidacy.'"

Crossposted @ WCTRC

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Does Creigh Deeds Care if his Constituents Lose Their Jobs?

One of the biggest debates going on in Washington D.C. right now is on the Cap and Trade bill. The House of Representatives recently passed this totalitarian bill, and now we are waiting on the senate to vote on it. Throughout this debate Bob McDonnell has voiced strong opposition to the job that will kill jobs, raise taxes, increase government control, and do nothing about the environment. Ever since the vote in the House of Representatives Republicans have been calling on Deeds to take a position on this bill. So far Creigh Deeds has taken no stance on the bill. Deeds' silence on this bill is even more curious because according to a recent RPV press release,
"One of the MeadWestvaco plants in his own Senate district stands to be directly affected by this bill. Many of the workers at the plant may lose their jobs because of the increased costs that will be imposed on the plant if the bill is passed in the Senate."
Assuming this statement is correct (we already know this bill will hit rural areas hardest) Deeds silence begs the question, does he care if his constituents lose their jobs? If he really cared about his constituents wouldn't he fight tooth and nail against this bill? Deeds refusal to oppose cap and trade tells Virginians he prefers partisan politics and standing with the national Democratic party over fighting for Virginians best interests. The Warner/Kaine administration was marked by partisanship. This is the tradition Creigh Deeds has pledged to follow, and sadly he is taking it to a new low by allowing Virginia to lose jobs in his support for partisan politics.

Monday, June 29, 2009

The Convention on the Rights of the Child Undermines the U.S. Military

Recently Obama began pushing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. In light of this fact I have been exploring different things this treaty will do to America if we enter into it. The U.S. Congress has a tendency to pass legislation without fully understanding what they are passing. I want to make sure this does not happen with the UN CRC.

One thing this treaty will do is undermine our own military. It does it in two ways: restricting army recruiters access to highschools, and limiting the amount of money America can spend on national defense. In California the UN CRC is being used to keep military recruiters out of highschools because they are encouraging people under 18 to join the military. While the courts have yet to decide on this issue, it is frightening to see how international law is being used to trump federal law once again. When it comes to military defense, the treaty expects everyone to agree with the notion that protecting children is the most important thing a nation can do. One application is the idea that if you aren't spending enough on your children as a nation you are clearly not protecting them.
National children’s health insurance and other social programs would be created in order to comply with the CRC. The U.S. would have to curtail defense spending in order to keep in proportion with these social expenses. To a western European country whose defense our military has subsidized for decades, this would have no major impact. But the effect would be devastating to both our economy and our security.
If you want to yield national sovereignty to an international body support the UN CRC, if you don't please contact your senator and the whitehouse and ask them to oppose passage of this treaty.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Randy Forbes Thoughts on the Passage of Cap and Trade

This afternoon following the passage of cap and trade Randy Forbes sent out an e-mail with his thoughts on the bill. Randy Forbes offered his New Manhattan Project as an alternative to the bill.
Friends -

Last night as many Americans began their weekend, the US House of Representatives was voting to saddle them and their families with a large additional tax burden through legislation, known as the cap-and-trade national energy tax.

The effects of this tax will be far reaching. It will impact American families in all parts of their daily lives – when they turn on a light switch, watch TV, mow their lawn, or run their dishwasher. Over the course of a year, the average family of four will see their energy costs rise by $1,200. Electric bills will rise by $754 per year and gasoline costs will rise by $596 per year. All total, an average family will to have to find an additional $100 in their monthly budgets to cover this new national energy tax - which is on top of the taxes already paid on energy bills.

This is wrong – especially now when so many have lost jobs and are just trying to make ends meet. I need your help as I continue to try to stop this burden on our families.

Businesses will feel the staggering cost of this legislation as well. Farmers and manufactures will be among those hardest hit. All total, the National Black Chamber of Commerce estimates this legislation will cost 2.5 million American jobs. Other estimates suggest anywhere between 1.8 and 7 million net American jobs could be lost. Many of these jobs will be shipped overseas. American businesses will face declining competitiveness as they struggle to compete with foreign companies whose products are not subject to this tax.
As the Wall Street Journal noted "Even as Democrats have promised that this cap-and-trade legislation won't pinch wallets, behind the scenes they've acknowledged the energy price tsunami that is coming. During the brief few days in which the bill was debated in the House Energy Committee, Republicans offered three amendments: one to suspend the program if gas hit $5 a gallon; one to suspend the program if electricity prices rose 10% over 2009; and one to suspend the program if unemployment rates hit 15%. Democrats defeated all of them."

Any glimmers of economic recovery in our recession are likely to be threatened by this new tax. Under this bill, already-strapped small businesses will face skyrocketing energy costs and will have less money to retain their current employees let alone create new jobs.
Sadly, even if one could overlook the crushing results of this bill on our economy, the legislation does not even meet its intended purpose. As the Washington Post reported yesterday, even environmental groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth oppose the bill saying it will not help our environment.

Last night I took to the floor and fought strongly against the passage of this national energy tax. I even introduced my widely-acclaimed New Manhattan Project for Energy Independence as an alternative. My bill would spur green energy innovation without raising taxes. The majority of my colleagues chose taxation, rather than innovation.

My constituents, however, overwhelmingly supported my position and my alternative to the national energy tax. Supportive emails and phone calls poured in my office all day.

The sad reality is that there are too few of us fighting to lower taxes and bring innovative bipartisan ideas before Congress. There are too few of us fighting against big government. There are too few of us fighting to preserve the individual freedom and liberties on which this great nation was founded. And those of us left will very likely face opponents next campaign year. I am writing to you today because I need your help to stay in Congress and to be your voice in Washington. This year, my campaign must rebuild our financial footing. If you believe in what I am doing in Congress would you please help us to do that?

Would you consider donating $20 to my campaign today? If you could do more, I would appreciate it. If you can only afford $10 now, I want you to know that your contribution makes a difference. Please also consider a monthly donation of $10 or $20. Individuals that give on a monthly basis form a powerful financial base for my campaign.

The cap-and-trade national energy tax must now be considered in the Senate. I’ll continue to fight against it and the tide of bailouts, runaway spending, and taxation in Washington. Let's hope we can stop this terrible bill.

As always, I remain, yours in service,

Randy

PS – The list of organizations opposed to the cap-and-trade national energy tax was staggering. Below is just a partial list. Would you forward this email to a friend that is a member of one of these organizations – or post this email on your Facebook page via the link below? Please let your concerned friends know of my position, of your support for me, and ask them to also support my campaign. We need your help.

Tea Party Patriots
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
American Farm Bureau Federation
60 Plus Association
Americans for Prosperity
Americans for Tax Reform
Citizens Against Government Waste
Club for Growth
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors
National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB)
National Taxpayers Union
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBE Council)
Association of Builders and Contractors (ABC)
Concerned Women for America (CWA)
Eagle Forum
Family Research Council Action
Focus on the Family
National Cotton Council

Political contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Corporate contributions are prohibited. To comply with federal law we must use our best efforts to report the name, address, occupation and employer of individuals whose contributions exceed $200. Contributions from foreign nationals and minors are prohibited. An individual may contribute $4,800 ($2,400 primary, $2,400 general).

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Virginians (Bolling, Periello, Nye, and Chuck Smith) on Cap and Trade

Today during the debate in the House of Representatives on cap and trade, Bill Bolling sent out an e-mail stating his opposition to cap and trade. Good luck to him on trying to get Jody Wagner to oppose cap and trade.
Last week, in response to a letter from American Solutions on the Waxman-Markey national energy tax (also known as "cap and trade"), Bill Bolling joined his running mate Bob McDonnell in opposition to massive new energy taxes on Virginia families and businesses.

In typical fashion, Bill's opponent, former Democratic Party of Virginia Vice-Chair Jody Wagner, refused to take a stand. (Wagner has also refused to take a stand on numerous other issues currently facing Virginia.)

The people of Virginia deserve a Lieutenant Governor who will lead, and you can't lead by ducking the issues that matter most to Virginia.

While Bill Bolling and Bob McDonnell have said "Yes" to More Energy, More Jobs for Virginians, Jody Wagner has said "No" to the development of Virginia's energy resources.

By opposing nuclear power, clean coal and the development of Virginia's offshore energy resources, Jody Wagner is rejecting common sense, job-creating solutions to our energy crisis and siding with the extremist wing of her party in opposing our attempts to create a more prosperous Virginia.
As far as the votes are concerned, while their was a lot of speculation over whether Tom Periello would vote against the bill, the only Virginia Democrat to vote against the bill was Glen Nye. Glen Nye simply voted no because he needed to get reelected. The Republican nominee to run against Glen Nye is Chuck Smith. He is a conservative African American Republican running for congress in the 2nd district and he has come out in opposition to using global warming as an excuse to raise taxes. The 2nd district is an example of the Democrats allowing Democrats to vote no to hel pin close elections. If you live in the 2nd district, don't let Nye fool you. Please elect a Chuck Smith a real conservative in 2010.

Cap and Trade Passes the House

Earlier I posted about John Boehner's courageous stand against the cap and trade bill. Sadly the bill passed 219-212. 44 Democrats voted against the bill, and 8 Republicans voted for it. Also Randy Forbes made an attempt to offer his New Manhattan Project bill as a substitute, but the Republicans could only muster about 172 votes.

The 8 traitorous Republicans (may they be primaried) are:
  1. Bono Mack
  2. Castle (Let's see how your run for U.S. Senate goes.)
  3. Kirk
  4. Lance
  5. LoBiondo
  6. McHugh
  7. Reichert
  8. Smith (NJ)
The 44 courageous Democrats are: (Dick Morris says these people were mermitted to vote no by the party and they didn't do it out of principle.)
  1. Altmire
  2. Arcuri
  3. Barrow
  4. Berry
  5. Boren
  6. Bright
  7. Carney
  8. Childers
  9. Costa
  10. Costello
  11. Dahlkemper
  12. Davis (AL)
  13. Davis (TN)
  14. DeFazio
  15. Donnelly (IN)
  16. Edwards (TX)
  17. Ellsworth
  18. Foster
  19. Griffith
  20. Horseth Sandlin
  21. Holden
  22. Kirkpatrick (AZ)
  23. Kissell
  24. Kucinich
  25. Marshall
  26. Massa
  27. Matheson
  28. McIntyre
  29. Melancon
  30. Minnick
  31. Mitchell
  32. Mollohan
  33. Nye
  34. Ortiz
  35. Pomeroy
  36. Rahall
  37. Rodriguez
  38. Ross
  39. Salazar
  40. Stark
  41. Tanner
  42. Taylor
  43. Visclosky
  44. Wilson (OH)

Friday, June 26, 2009

Boehner Fillibustering on the House Floor

As a result of an obscure House Rule Boehner as majority leader is fillibustering on the house floor on the vote on the Cap and Trade bill. He is going page by page through the bill and explaining how and why it is the biggest government takeover ever. How you build your house, the materials you use, zoning, and even green banking centers is dictated by the bill.

Go to C-Span and watch it. http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx

"When you file a 300 page Amendment at 3:09 AM, the AMERICAN PEOPLE have the RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT'S IN IT!"

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Cuccinelli Consistent. Shannon Shifting.

Today was the first Attorney General debate of the general election. In the leadup to it, Steve Shannon wanted to limit the use of audio and video clips from the debate. I think Ken Cuccinelli's press release explains why.

Cuccinelli answers questions, takes positions - Steve Shannon? Well, he was there.

Candidates agree that debates are substantive for campaigning, agree to hold more.

Virginia Beach -

In the Commonwealth's first debate for the office of Attorney General hosted by the Virginia Bar Association, Republican Senator Ken Cuccinelli and Democrat Steve Shannon touched on a host of issues that demonstrated a wide difference in opinion and approach as to how they would operate as Attorney General.

Cuccinelli made clear that he would support and defend Virginia's right to work laws, where Steve Shannon has a 100% voting record with the AFL-CIO. Shannon refused to take a position on "Cap and Trade" - an issue that the next Attorney General will have to deal with as Washington continues to encroach on States economic prerogatives.

"I am pleased that Steve and I had this opportunity to debate on such a wide variety of topics said Senator Ken Cuccinelli. Virginians will be surprised to learn that not only will Steve Shannon not take positions on important issues but that if and when he does he will almost assuredly change them. Virginians need an Attorney General they can count on. As your next Attorney General I will interpret and defend the constitution and will remain consistent in my beliefs" added Cuccinelli.

In a debate lasting a little over an hour, moderated by the Executive Director of the Sorensen Institute at the University of Virginia Bob Gibson, members of the Virginia State Bar and Virginia's current Attorney General Bill Mims could witness first hand Steve Shannon's unwillingness to state a position on any major issue. His refusal to answer a question on the pending 4th Circuit Court ruling on Partial Birth Abortion and changing (again) position on the marriage amendment is indicative of a man without any sense of direction. He most certainly will have to deal with these and many other questions as Attorney General, but his silence speaks volumes.

Senator Ken Cuccinelli was the only candidate to unveil any major policy initiatives that he would pursue as Attorney General. These proposals will be discussed in detail in the weeks ahead, but go to the core of the job of Attorney General. "The first, consolidating the office of Consumer Affairs under the office of Attorney General would streamline government, provide a clear line of authority for business and get consumers off the Merry-go-around of where to go to get help said Ken Cuccinelli. How much sense does it make to house part of consumer affairs in the Agriculture Department?" added Cuccinelli. The second policy initiative would make the Virginia Court of Appeals a middle level of appeal for all cases, unlike its current, very limited authority. "This will help bring consistent application to the law of Virginia, and will offer the chance for truly meritorious appeals that now do not get consideration because of the Supreme Court's workload limitations," said Senator Cuccinelli. "It's a change a long time in coming."

# # #